Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Once upon a time, He was TRIVIKRAM!

Trivikram, the name which never needs an introduction.
He became phenomenal with his dialogues & making. How long he can be having the same qualities? Has he changed?

Okay, recently his Atharintiki daredi released & became a big hit all over. It is shattering all previous records & creating new milestones for TFI. I watched the film and really liked it. Mean while watching, i had so many doubts in my mind & came out from theater with a big question, was it really a trivikram film? Hope not only me, but most of you got the same doubt after watching.

What i missed?!
1.Punch package: trivikram started his career as a writer & had a huge success in it. All his movies will have a package of punches (whatever the situation is). In AD, he is light in this section & let the conversations simple. People always expect (infact, want to see) a bunch of punches from him. I didn't get the why he took this light.
2.Making: his screenplay, always flawless & makes film better even on repeat watching. Still Athadu ranking huge TRP ratings, whenever it plays on TV. All his films are perfect in this department, except AD. It was flat & looks like a regual commercial film, because of easy screenplay. It will be a big surprise for me, if anyone had the same feeling on movie on 2nd watch.
3.Picturization: trivikram film are best in quality. His presentation is good with best quality of picturization. Seems he had a vision on camera & portraits like a painting. Piliche pedavula from khaleja is proof enough that he is the best in this department(not only that song, but all of his songs). In AD, he hasn't give a thought about it i think. Movie had good technical values, but not songs. Mostly he captured all songs out-door & looks very simple. Especially, the most energetic track, aaradugula bullet doesn't get any applause in theater, pavan kalyan is the lead role though.
4.Under-content Comedy: comedy is the big asset of trivikram movies & no one give a thought that it is not plot of movie. Yes, he mix humour in his conversations & never put any comic scenes out of the plot. Recently, TFI is going on a success mantra, which is nothing but hilarious sequences. Sreenu vaitla always have it in his films & gets hits by depending on it. I don't know why trivikram also took a step into this genre. In AD, brahmi had a surprising entry & character doesn't had any importance (infact, no need). Even a small kid can understand, that his character is out of the plot. Even more surprisingly he had put a marathon comedy sequence on him. There is no need to say, it remembers dream chair scene of baadshah. (i don't want to give a spoiler at this point. But i found this video on net, seems an inspiration for trivikram click here to watch video. Undoubtedly a bad move.
5.Logics: generally a genius thinks that all people are fools & he can fool them easily. trivikram might had same thought in his mind. Unlike his old movies he is not concentrating about logics. He might stick to his dialogue in julayi, 'logic lu akkarledu, andariki magic le kavali'. In Khaleja he had put sidda's episode in an unconvincing way. Later, in julayi he took another step & made more logic less scenes like, hero's prediction, interval fight scene etc. Now in AD we can't count how many he did. `In introduction song, hero walks without shoes & his assistant carries those & walks along with him. Any logic? `praneeta's boyfriend comes out from car's front mirror by applying sudden break, but praneeta, who sits very next to him will not even move from her seat. `pk comes to india to bring his athayya back to home, but he never talk to her, even she asked about his presence. `praneeta adore pk, she loves another boy, ofcourse we had a song between them. Samantha losts her brain, for a song? Sidhappa's gang want to fight with pk's goggles, but not with pk (sadly). I wanna to stop here.
               particularly in AD, he did many mistakes (including above), he wanted to put fight, so created introduction fight(just a deal about company). He wanted to capture songs, so praneeta adores him & Samantha lost her brain for limited time.
                As a huge trivikram fan, i really like him, when he did good movies, instead of commercial entertainers. I never care about his movies doing good business or not, i cannot give a chance to miss his nuvvey nuvvey, athadu, jalsa & khaleja on TV. Hope he knows why did athadu screened most times & khaleja going equally with it. People love him & watch his film repeatedly. But with his recent steps, he is degrading himself from unique to normal level.

Finally,
     Dear trivikram sir, meeru sikharam, maku kanipinchalani meeru kindaki ravakkarledu.
Love you sir, for your ultimate passion towards cinema.
I want to see our old good trivikram back again.

   "Ardha satabdapu agjnaananni swatantamandama? Maripoina oka maha gjnaani ni TRIVIKRAM andama?"

PS: if you don't like this post, you can slap me in twitter @channdu

No comments: